Commentaire
This regressive mindset that is entirely based off on feelings and contradicted by actual evidence, both recently here, and all over the world, has got to go. We don't need to expand car infrastructure. We NEED to build up other alternative to driving to the quality that would allow them to genuinely be viable options. Adding more drivers to the road because it's the ONLY viable option is not a solution. Expanding our options and making them attractive is. I'm so exhausted of hearing about regressive proposals about removal of bike infrastructure, limiting transit projects, more car infrastructure proposals. It's the 21st century. We have all the information, we have all the data, we have other societies who have vastly outpaced us because we have government officials who are ignorant, wilfully or otherwise, to the realities of every day life and choose to push non sense proposals that sound like it'd be a good idea, if you don't take a fraction of a second and to pause and think about it.
Absolutely ridiculous. Even worse, with one of the most openly corrupt provincial governments in power that I've lived through in my lifetime. Allowing them power over my municipal representatives and what currently impacts my everyday life, when they are this blatantly corrupt and disconnected from the lived realities of every day people is an absurdity I have trouble expressing through words.
Soumis le 24 octobre 2024 8:43 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
104200
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire