I strongly oppose Bill 212…

I strongly oppose Bill 212 and its proposed framework for bike lanes. This legislation represents a significant step backward in our efforts to create safe, sustainable, and livable cities. Here's why:

Prioritizes Cars Over People: Bill 212 prioritizes the convenience of drivers over the safety and well-being of cyclists and pedestrians. Removing traffic lanes to make way for bike lanes is a proven strategy to encourage cycling, reduce congestion, and improve road safety for everyone.

Undermines Municipal Autonomy: This bill strips municipalities of their ability to make decisions about their own transportation infrastructure. Local governments are best positioned to understand the specific needs of their communities and should have the authority to implement solutions that work for them.

Contradicts Climate Goals: At a time when we should be doing everything we can to reduce our reliance on cars and promote sustainable transportation, Bill 212 sends the wrong message. Investing in cycling infrastructure is essential to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and creating healthier communities.

Ignores Public Health Benefits: Cycling has numerous benefits for physical and mental health. By making it more difficult to build bike lanes, Bill 212 discourages active transportation and contributes to a less healthy population.

Lacks Evidence-Based Decision-Making: There is overwhelming evidence that bike lanes improve road safety for all users, reduce congestion, and boost local economies. Bill 212 ignores this evidence and puts the interests of drivers ahead of the needs of the broader community.

I urge the government to reconsider this misguided legislation and instead work with municipalities to create transportation systems that prioritize the safety and well-being of all Ontarians.