Commentaire
As someone who relies on biking due to financial constraints, I’m deeply concerned about the impact of this bill. I cannot afford the costs of driving, paid rides, or even frequent bus fare, so biking is my only viable option for getting around. Due to frequent close calls with vehicles, I often ride on the sidewalk despite bylaws, because safe, accessible bike lanes are limited. However, sidewalks are not always an option, meaning I must sometimes risk my safety on busy roads.
This bill, which prioritizes the convenience of drivers over the safety and accessibility of cyclists like me, sends a troubling message: that my life and mobility needs are secondary to the conveniences enjoyed by those who can afford to drive. My fear is that by restricting bike lanes, this bill will force cyclists into more dangerous conditions, all to save a few minutes for car commuters. It’s disheartening and frustrating to feel that my safety is being overlooked in favour of convenience.
Soumis le 25 octobre 2024 10:21 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
106091
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire