Commentaire
commenting in my personal AND professional capacity as a downtown Ottawa Resident and cycling and triathlon coach.
i'm all for reducing gridlock. but adding lanes to highways is not the way to do that. there have been multiple studies on "induce traffic demand" (see below). adding lanes would increase traffic, not reduce it.
but here is the MOST IMPORTANT mistake in this bill....
municipalities should NOT require provincial approval for building bike lanes. municialities should know how important bike lanes are, both for commuting and for leisure (and if they don't, they ought to... they have the demographic data). fewer bike lanes = more bikes on the road = more injuries and deaths. there should be FEWER obstacles to buidling bike lanes, not more.
do all you want to attempt to ease congestion, but preventing bike lanes is stupid and dangerous
"induced traffic demand" studies:
https://www.ucdavis.edu/magazine/does-widening-highways-ease-traffic-co…
https://www.thecgo.org/research/does-expanding-highway-capacity-solve-u…
https://usa.streetsblog.org/2017/06/21/the-science-is-clear-more-highwa…
Soumis le 25 octobre 2024 11:53 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps – Loi de 2024 sur la construction plus rapide de voies publiques
Numéro du REO
019-9265
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
106171
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire