Commentaire
I am unsure how this legislation simultaneously claims that "accidents ... can worsen traffic congestion" while proposing the removal of infrastructure proven to reduce collisions.
Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the "right to life... and security of the person." Removing infrastructure that was implemented to uphold these rights is legally problematic.
Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees "equal treatment before and under the law, and equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination." This legislation only mentions drivers, and fails to acknowledge those who are neither in motor vehicles, nor have the ability to travel in one.
This legislation claims to reduce congestion, yet it actively promotes the least spatially efficient mode of transportation above more efficient ways of moving people. I am not convinced that what is proposed is informed by the available research on the effect of installing safer, less car-centred infrastructure.
Soumis le 31 octobre 2024 10:03 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
108639
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire