Opposition Statement to Bill…

Opposition Statement to Bill 212 - Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024

Bill 212, which proposes the removal of certain bike lanes in Toronto and the imposition of provincial control over future bike lane decisions, undermines proven benefits of cycling infrastructure in urban centers. Research consistently demonstrates that well-planned bike lanes improve safety, reduce traffic congestion, and support local businesses. Removing or restricting bike lanes would not only disregard these benefits but could also hinder Ontario's progress toward building more livable, sustainable, and economically vibrant cities.

1. Bike Lanes Improve Safety for All Road Users
Evidence from cities around the world shows that bike lanes enhance safety for all road users, including cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers. A study from the University of Colorado found that adding protected bike lanes in cities across the United States led to a 44% reduction in road injuries overall and a 50% reduction in severe or fatal crashes involving pedestrians and cyclists. By designating safe spaces for cyclists, bike lanes reduce conflicts with motor vehicles, which is especially critical in high-traffic areas like Bloor Street, Yonge Street, and University Avenue.

2. Bike Lanes Alleviate Traffic Congestion
Counter to claims that bike lanes increase congestion, numerous studies show that they can ease it. Cities that invested in cycling infrastructure have seen reduced car usage and congestion. For example, New York City’s protected bike lanes led to an increase in bike commuting and a corresponding reduction in vehicle congestion along key corridors. In Portland, Oregon, the city’s network of bike lanes contributes to moving people more efficiently, with each cyclist occupying less road space and creating less congestion than a single car. By accommodating cyclists, bike lanes help to optimize road space for all users, creating a more efficient and balanced transportation network.

3. Economic Benefits for Local Businesses
Bike lanes support local business growth by increasing foot traffic and making business districts more accessible. Research by the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation found that cyclists and pedestrians spend more per month at local businesses than drivers, particularly in neighborhoods with high foot and bike traffic. A study in New York City further confirmed this, showing that streets with protected bike lanes saw a 49% increase in retail sales. Restricting bike lanes could jeopardize this economic boost, especially in densely populated areas where cycling is a popular mode of transport.

4. Environmental and Public Health Benefits
Cities worldwide are investing in cycling infrastructure to meet environmental targets, reduce pollution, and improve public health. Bike lanes are a key element in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality by reducing the number of short car trips. For instance, studies indicate that if more people shifted from driving to cycling for short trips, it would significantly lower vehicle emissions, particularly in high-traffic urban areas. Bill 212’s exemption from the Environmental Assessment Act is concerning, as it suggests a disregard for the public health impacts associated with increased vehicle emissions if bike lanes are removed.

5. Provincial Overreach and Impact on Local Decision-Making
Municipalities are best positioned to assess and address local transportation needs. Shifting authority to the provincial level risks creating a one-size-fits-all approach that may not serve the specific needs of communities. The proposal for provincial review and control over future bike lanes could inhibit municipalities from implementing tailored, sustainable transportation solutions that enhance quality of life for their residents. Local governments, with their nuanced understanding of community needs, should maintain the flexibility to plan and sustain cycling infrastructure.

Conclusion
Bill 212 proposes a restrictive framework that contradicts the proven benefits of bike lanes and threatens to stymie Ontario's progress in fostering safer, more sustainable, and economically vibrant communities. Investing in bike infrastructure is not only about supporting cycling but is a comprehensive strategy that improves road safety, reduces congestion, enhances local economies, and promotes public health. We urge policymakers to reconsider this legislation, consult widely, and prioritize policies that promote a balanced and forward-thinking transportation system for Ontario.