Commentaire
Neither my MPP Kinga Surma (Minister of Infrastructure) nor MPP Sarkaria (Minister of Transportation) are willing to listen to any comments or concerns or criticism from constituents that disagree with the proposals on this bill. This government has continued to waste taxpayer money while congratulating themselves on completing infrastructure projects that were well under way before they were involved. It is absolutely ludicrous to spend more money and time reconfiguring roads that have just finished major construction projects. At the very least if the intention is to reconsider the bike lanes in Toronto then you must first give us evidence based reasoning for reconfiguring the infrastructure, as it currently stands there is no form of equitable explanation given for the proposals in this bill beyond a vague assumption that this will fix congestion when there are multiple other factors at play. Will the province be willing to relocate the cycling infrastructure to alternate locations? What if there are no alternatives possible? The current lanes service a large portion of the city and are the foundation of the east/west and north/south cycling infrastructure. Give us something beyond the populist sloganeering, people want evidence.
Soumis le 1 novembre 2024 3:11 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
110001
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire