Commentaire
The measures proposed in this bill could lead to increased reliance on car travel, undermining efforts to promote sustainable transportation alternatives such as public transit, cycling, and walking. Furthermore, the focus on expanding road infrastructure may not address the root causes of gridlock, such as inadequate public transit options and urban sprawl. Instead of investing in long-term solutions that foster a more interconnected and efficient transportation network, this bill risks perpetuating a cycle of congestion.
Safe and accessible bike lanes are essential components of our transportation network, providing a viable alternative to car travel and improving overall safety for all road users. Enhancing this basic infrastructure not only encourages cycling but also reduces congestion and promotes healthier lifestyles.
Additionally, this legislation creates unnecessary red tape that hampers local governments' efforts to implement effective transportation solutions. By imposing rigid regulations, the bill undermines the flexibility that municipalities need to address their unique transportation challenges. Local governments are often best positioned to understand their communities' needs, and this legislation could stifle innovative approaches that could alleviate congestion and enhance mobility.
Soumis le 3 novembre 2024 12:56 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
111711
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire