Commentaire
As a road user and tax payer in Ontario that both cycles and drives, I am strongly opposed to the bill, for a few simple reasons.
* Congestion on the road is caused by too many cars, not too many bikes. There is good evidence that the installation of a comprehensive bike lane network shifts road users from car to bikes - and hence reduces congestion. The Bill ignores all this evidence and good planning practice. Thus, it is very likely that the bill will lead to more congestion, not less.
* The bill takes planning autonomy away from local communities. Good solutions are best found by the local communities and municipalities, not dictated by a provincial or federal government.
* Dictating the removal of already established bike lanes causes more disruption, and costs valuable tax dollars. It is simply financially irresponsible.
* I agree that better provincial planning guidelines for the integration of car, pedestrian and cycling infrastructure are desirable. The proposed bill, however, abandons best established practice.
Soumis le 6 novembre 2024 9:23 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
113798
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire