Commentaire
As a primary user of Toronto downtown bicycle infrastructure from 2019-2022 I can say it allowed for me to start my career and afford to live in the city.
I saw no possible alternative to live in this city if it wasn't for the dedicated bike lanes on Bloor, University, and Addelaide/Richmond (when they aren't under construction).
I absent of a city planning degree can only speak personally about the necessity of dedicated lanes on arterial roads. Drawing on the eastern portion of Lakeshore bike trail, it is impractical and time-prohibitive to rely on residential routes as a primary route for commuters. The same conclusions can be drawn in the inner-city, with little to no option of a direct corridor on residential streets that span multiple areas in the inner city. Requirements change based on postal codes, regardless of city, and effective planning must consider integrating a bike network holistically.
A case for reviewing proposed and fully implemented bike lanes should be had. It is however important to view primary commuters as those not only using bike lanes as a work commute; but rather those using it for their livelihoods and personal pleasure.
As a resident of another metropolitan center in the province, I worry about the current Governments plans to scrap Toronto's bike network still in it's infancy and with portions under scrutiny not yet completed. I will continue to use the bike network in my city for my work and personal commutes. And should plans for continued disinvestment in bike infrastructure continue, I have see no issue using the extended pedestrian walkways.. as there is no pedestrians using them (they're all in cars)
Soumis le 7 novembre 2024 12:53 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
113928
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire