Commentaire
I use bike lanes in my city, and it is my main transportation, and despite following rules in bike lanes, cars are overly aggressive to people in our area, and I see this decision going backwards. We have had three deaths in the last month for vehicle-person because we need infrastructure.
The provincial government shouldn't be adding red tape to what should be a right to safe transportation and in return slowing down a resolution to safe transportation options.
I use bike lanes every day and year round to get to work, buy my groceries, and consider them essential infrastructure (and also sidewalks)
We need to think about guaranteeing safety for the people who choose not to drive, and vulnerable road users, including wheelchair users, instead of maximizing the amount of cars on the road, we need diversity.
If I were driving (and I do-so I can see both perspectives), I would rather a cyclist have their own bike lane out of the way.
Bike lanes support transit because they make it easier to get to train station stops and bus stops.
Take a look at how functional the Netherlands are, they have figured out proper traffic calming
Soumis le 8 novembre 2024 12:23 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
114228
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire