Commentaire
I strongly oppose Bill 212, as it represents an overreach by the provincial government into the affairs of local municipalities. This bill would add unnecessary red tape and hinder cities' ability to improve cycling infrastructure, which is crucial for the safety and well-being of residents.
As someone who uses cycling for all my commuting needs, I can confidently say it is the fastest, most affordable, healthiest, and most enjoyable mode of transit. The improvements my city has made in cycling infrastructure have been impressive, and I want to see more progress. My friends, many of whom are hesitant to cycle due to safety concerns, would be even more discouraged if this bill passed.
The more bike lanes we have, the safer cycling becomes, reducing harm and creating more livable cities. Bill 212 would set us back by limiting the ability of cities to make these vital improvements, and I urge the government to reconsider this harmful legislation. We need policies that empower cities to build safer, more sustainable communities, not ones that create unnecessary barriers.
Soumis le 8 novembre 2024 9:28 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
114359
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire