Commentaire
I’m strongly opposed to Bill 212. As a regular cyclist, I support having safe roads for vulnerable users. While cycling, I often already deal with aggressive drivers even with physical barriers/lanes. Removing them will make drivers even more aggressive and agitated, and even more dangerous for cyclists. With bike lanes, car drivers will feel more comfortable knowing that cyclists have enough space to bike next to them. Cycling also contributes to the Paris Agreement goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global warming is already having negative implications on the world, and having more cars on roads is just making things worst. We should be encouraging greener commuting alternatives like cycling. When you build cycling infrastructure, people will start using them more. The evidence is in the Bike Share statistics. Usage rates have skyrocketed in recent years. Vulnerable users deserve to have safe roads to get from point A to B.
Soumis le 12 novembre 2024 2:50 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
115098
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire