Commentaire
This is bill would push us backwards in regard to the environment if the development of the 413 goes as planned. I am not against arterial and ring roads. It's actually good to have those to keep people from rat running through local streets.
The 413 should not be the 413 with its four lanes and instead by a two lane arterial road with roundabouts, minor streets yielding with turn lanes from the arterial to the minor roadway at intersections, and signalized intersections and turn lanes when needed. It should be facilitates by a multi-use path which runs parallel to this prioritized road.
In addition to that idea, adding red tape to install bike lanes where an automobile lane is removed is silly. Local areas often know the local situation best, not the provincial government.
We see this in the data that the Ontario government used and has quoted to justify removing the bike lane.
Also, ripping up recently put in bicycle infrastructure is not fiscally conservative, so how is this a wise use of taxpayer money? It's not.
Soumis le 17 novembre 2024 5:27 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
116603
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire