Commentaire
This bill makes me very upset. I feel proud of the progress that Toronto has made as a bike-friendly city over the past few years and use the Bloor bike lane 5+ times per week. For me, cycling is the fastest and most enjoyable way to commute within the city and I cycle daily to carry out every day tasks. The bike lanes on major arteries make this faster and safer for me.
I find the idea that “bikes lanes can be moved onto secondary streets” to be insulting and out of touch from reality. It implies that cycling is a leisure activity and that taking a circuitous route is somehow fine for cyclists. In particular, the bike lane on University that just opened has been a pleasure to use, and the wide divider makes me feel safer than I ever have biking in the city. I think it’s precisely these types of bike lanes that make people feel safe enough to stop driving and to bike instead, reducing congestions.
I feel that bike lanes are a municipal issue and that Premier Ford is strong arming the city on this issue to pander to his base. This is not a data-driven decision and it will not solve congestion - it will only cause more cyclists to die.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 11:34 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117614
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire