Commentaire
As a Toronto resident who regularly cycles for both commuting and weekend shopping, I am deeply concerned about and strongly oppose Bill 212.
Bike lanes are essential for my safety and the safety of countless others who rely on them. Cycling on roads without bike lanes is intimidating and dangerous, especially on busy and major streets. Bike lanes create a safer and more predictable environment for all road users, including drivers.
Removing existing bike lanes is not only a waste of resources but also disregards the proven benefits they bring to Toronto. Studies consistently show that bike lanes reduce traffic congestion, improve safety for everyone on the road, support local businesses by increasing foot and bike traffic, and contribute to environmental sustainability. These critical advantages appear to have been ignored—or worse, deliberately misrepresented—during the drafting of this bill.
Finally, decisions about bike infrastructure should be made at the municipal level, where local leaders can better understand and address the needs of their constituents. Provincial interference undermines the ability of cities like Toronto to plan for safer and more sustainable transportation networks.
I urge decision-makers to reject this bill and instead prioritize evidence-based policies that enhance safety, mobility, and quality of life for all residents.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 11:48 AM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
117640
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire