Commentaire
I strongly oppose this proposed bill. It will negatively impact the City of Toronto and Ontario residents with limited benefits.
This proposal will:
Increase red tape and bureaucracy: By imposing unnecessary regulations, it will slow down municipal decision-making processes and hinder efficient service delivery. Municipalities are best served to make informed choices on where and how to implement bike lanes. Provincial oversight in this space is an overreach that will reap limited benefits and instead stall municipal development.
Undermine safety: While the intent may be to prioritize drivers, this proposal could inadvertently lead to less safe conditions. By focusing on maximizing the number of cars on the road, it disregards the importance of alternative transportation modes like cycling. Without bike lanes, cyclists are forced to drive alongside cars - creating dangerous situations for both parties.
Hinder essential transportation: Cycling is a crucial mode of transportation, especially for commuters and those living in urban areas. Safe bike infrastructure supports transit connections and promotes sustainable, environmentally friendly travel. Bloor, Yonge & University are key city arteries, that with effective urban infrastructure, can serve more city commuters than just those with the privilege of owning a vehicle.
I urge the government to reconsider this proposal and instead support initiatives that promote safe and efficient transportation for all, including cyclists. By investing in bike infrastructure and encouraging active transportation, we can create healthier, more sustainable, and safer communities.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 8:15 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118747
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire