Commentaire
I am writing to express my strong support for expanding safe cycling infrastructure across Ontario, as well as my concerns about the additional red tape and bureaucracy that may delay these essential projects.
Bike lanes should be considered as essential as sidewalks—they provide safe, accessible options for vulnerable road users, including cyclists and pedestrians, rather than focusing solely on maximizing car traffic. Bike lanes are a critical part of our transportation network. I use bike lanes daily and view them as essential infrastructure, especially for safely accessing transit stations. They offer a practical and reliable way to get around without the hassle of parking, allowing me to support more local businesses along my route.
Additionally, as a driver, I prefer to see cyclists safely in bike lanes rather than on busy roads, where it’s challenging and risky for everyone. Providing protected bike lanes ensures safer streets for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians alike.
I urge you to respect local authority and not proceed with Bill 212, which would limit cities' ability to make decisions best suited to their unique needs and communities. Cities understand the needs of their residents and are in the best position to design infrastructure that ensures safe, accessible streets for everyone. Streamlining the approval process for cycling infrastructure, without restrictive legislation, is crucial to making our cities safer and more vibrant.
Thank you for considering this important issue.
Soumis le 19 novembre 2024 8:24 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
118770
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire