Commentaire
I am very concerned that Bill 212 goes against the dozen year's progress since the 2012 Coroner's Report that recommended bike lanes and safe infrastructure to prevent cyclist deaths and serious injury. Vision Zero is realistic and achievable. While our population continues to grow across the province, we must shift transportation to active sustainable modes to prevent congestion, reduce pollution and improve health (our diabetes epidemic). Bike lanes for cycling and other forms of micromobility are the only safe method for doing this. When physicians (120 from U of T) who signed a letter, are against the removal of bike lanes, we need to listen to the evidence. When the Association of Municipalities of Ontario call this policy "significant overreach", we should listen. When the Ontario Professional Planners Institute are against this policy, they know how to design cities and towns and we should listen. They know how adding lanes for cars just creates more demand. (Look at 410 that is jam-packed with cars day and night.) When we have people struggling to budget their expenses and choose active transportation, we have a duty to think about equity and listen to them. Savvy entrepreneurs know cyclists and pedestrians stop and shop, not the car drivers who are passing through. BIAs have the statistics to prove this. This is a waste of taxpayers' money to rip up what has already been studied and built, and to micromanage the good work of the municipalities. Put money into transit and health instead!
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 3:19 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
120545
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire