Commentaire
Investments in robust public transit systems should take precedence over new highway developments. Public transit not only reduces congestion but also provides a more sustainable and equitable transportation option for all residents, including those who cannot or choose not to drive.
As someone who does not rely on car infrastructure, the proposed highway-focused measures do not address my transportation needs. Instead, I would greatly benefit from enhanced transit services, bike lanes, and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure.
Decades of research demonstrate that building more highways does not solve congestion issues in the long term. Expanding road capacity often induces demand, leading to the same level of gridlock on a larger scale. This approach simply shifts the problem rather than resolving it.
The solution to gridlock lies in reducing reliance on single-occupancy vehicles. This can be achieved through investments in comprehensive transit networks, active transportation options, and smart city planning that reduces the need for extensive commutes.
I urge policymakers to reconsider the focus of this legislation and allocate resources toward sustainable, transit-focused solutions that better address congestion while fostering a healthier, more inclusive transportation system for all Ontarians.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 6:06 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
121001
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire