Commentaire
I am against this bill because I believe the essential goals of the bill of reducing gridlock will not be accomplished by the bill.
1) Removing the environmental review for Highway 413 seems like the government knows that the review will not go well and is preempting this with the justification that "it cuts red tape". Rushing destruction of the greenbelt seems to be this government's only goal.
2) How will highway 413 reduce gridlock? Won't it just incentivize more people to use cars - more cars is more traffic.
3) Removing bike lanes on Bloor sees premature - they are 1 new / they establish a major bike arterial going east west - the more people biking means that there are less cars resulting in less gridlock (that extra lane was just parked cars anyways)
Since the province is taking the onus to dictate street design too Municpalities - the province should take over the costs associated with the construction and maintenance of all major roadways.
I am a 905 voter and will not be supporting any Conservative candidate in my riding if this bill passes it represents clear provincial overreach.
Soumis le 20 novembre 2024 6:43 PM
Commentaire sur
Projets de loi 212 – Loi de 2024 sur le désengorgement du réseau routier et le gain de temps - Cadre en matière de pistes cyclables nécessitant le retrait d’une voie de circulation.
Numéro du REO
019-9266
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
121084
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire