Commentaire
While I acknowledge that the purpose of the bill is to eliminate cost, I disagree wholeheartedly with the use of the word "unnecessary". The Toxic Reductions Act protects and prioritizes the health of Ontario residents, and repealing it will put your constituents and their environment at risk. Education about toxins is not unnecessary. Furthermore, repealing the Wireless Services Agreements Act would increase necessary phone bill costs for many Ontarians - promises of harmonizing with the federal government's national wireless code must be upheld in a timely fashion in order to prevent this. I do not support Bill 66.
Soumis le 8 décembre 2018 12:40 AM
Commentaire sur
Projet de loi 66 : Loi de 2018 sur la restauration de la capacité concurrentielle de l’Ontario
Numéro du REO
013-4293
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
14129
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire