Commentaire
October 4, 2017
Ala Boyd
Manager - Natural Heritage Section
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Policy Division
Natural Resources Conservation Policy Branch
300 Water Street
Peterborough ON K9J 8M5
Dear Ms. Boyd:
RE: EBR Registry Number 013-1014
Criteria, methods, and mapping of the proposed regional Natural Heritage System for the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe
The Severn Sound Environmental Association (SSEA) is pleased that the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) has taken the lead on producing a Natural Heritage System (NHS) for the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), and we appreciate the opportunity to comment.
The SSEA’s mission is to sustain environmental quality achieved through previous restoration efforts, and ensure ongoing protection of Severn Sound and its tributaries through wise stewardship. The SSEA is a Joint Service Board under the Municipal Act, and works closely with nine lower tier municipalities and two upper tier municipalities in the Severn Sound area, as well as provincial and federal government agencies and non-government organizations. The SSEA works to keep water clean so it supports healthy terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and has been actively involved in identifying and documenting natural heritage features for several member municipalities for use in their Official Plan updates.
We offer the following comments on the Draft NHS:
1.There are regional differences in existing natural heritage features and areas in the GGH Growth Plan area. For example, the composition and value of natural heritage features in north Simcoe County is quite different from elsewhere in the GGH. This should be recognized in protection policies.
2.Legislation and policies are most effective when there is accurate, up-to-date information to support them. Local natural heritage information and data may be available from agencies such as SSEA and Conservation Authorities; in addition, municipalities in the SSEA area have developed natural heritage mapping to support their Official Plans. This local information has not been incorporated into the Draft NHS, and should be used to refine the provincial NHS, where available.
3.When finalized, the NHS mapping and data should be easily accessible by agencies, to allow for integration with other planning information such as Source Water Protection.
4.A mechanism is needed to allow for updates to the NHS in future, since natural heritage
guidance, information, and the criteria for identification of features changes over time.
5.There is a need for the Province to support and assist municipalities as they incorporate the
NHS into their Official Plans.
Thank you again for the opportunity to offer feedback on the proposed regional Natural Heritage System for the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. To ensure success, we trust that adequate resources will be committed in support of its implementation. The SSEA would be pleased to meet with you or further discuss these comments.
[Original Comment ID: 211106]
Soumis le 12 février 2018 11:16 AM
Commentaire sur
Critères, méthodes et cartographie du système régional proposé du patrimoine naturel pour le plan de croissance pour le Grand Golden Horseshoe
Numéro du REO
013-1014
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
1437
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire