Commentaire
Government policies impacting wildlife and the environment must have a sound scientific basis. "Concerns" expressed by the commercial fishing industry and property owners represent hearsay evidence and not science. The Double-crested Cormorant seems to be a handy scapegoat when other factors may be having a more significant impact on fish supplies (e.g. development activity, pesticide runoff, climate change, overfishing). Classifying the cormorant as a "game bird" makes a joke of game bird management. A thorough scientific environmental assessment is required before any policies are adopted on this issue.
Soumis le 13 décembre 2018 9:59 PM
Commentaire sur
Proposition en vue d’établir une saison de chasse pour le cormoran à aigrettes en Ontario
Numéro du REO
013-4124
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
14694
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire