Commentaire
The following comments are submitted on behalf of the City of Greater Sudbury in response to this Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) proposal. As a northern municipality with a diverse geography, significant natural resources, and unique environmental and economic considerations, we appreciate the opportunity to provide input and respectfully submit the following observations and recommendations for consideration:
Ministerial Oversight on New Requirements: While we support greater consistency in development approvals, requiring provincial approval before adding new local requirements risks delaying site-specific responses. A streamlined process should be created for municipalities to seek expedited approvals in cases with environmental, infrastructure, or safety considerations.
Professional Certification Deemed Complete: We urge the Province to retain municipal discretion to request clarifications or supplemental documentation. Not all certified reports are created equal—especially in high-risk or technically complex projects.
As-of-Right Setback Variations: Municipalities should be permitted to apply limitations or performance criteria in specific neighbourhoods where cumulative effects (on drainage, privacy, heritage integrity) are a concern.
Schools on Urban Residential Lands / Portable Classrooms: These changes are not expected to impact Greater Sudbury directly at this time. We support the general intent but recommend that municipalities retain tools (e.g., site plan control) to manage land use compatibility where appropriate.
Soumis le 10 juin 2025 2:48 PM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées à la Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire et à la Loi de 2006 sur la cité de Toronto (annexes 3 et 7 du projet de loi 17 – Loi de 2025 pour protéger l’Ontario en construisant plus rapidement et plus efficacement)
Numéro du REO
025-0461
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
149656
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire