If the populations have…

If the populations have stabilized/ are in decline, there should be strong evidence to support an open hunting season on these animals. I am not aware of studies assessing the environmental impact of cormorants in regard to habitats or other species. And if certain groups are expressing concerns about the interference of cormorants on their activities, should there not be an investigation (consisting of a literature review or studies) to legitimize those concerns? Establishing the evidence that supports this change is essential, as is avoiding decisions based on hearsay.

A major concern comes to mind when I see this proposed change: that nesting sites are open access for hunting and the potential for destroying entire colonies is created.

I would not support, nor should anyone, this move without strong evidence and a thorough investigation to make sure it is beneficial and not a disastrous one.

From the review I linked: "biological and economic impacts attributed to cormorants, especially fishery impacts, are often complex and difficult to establish unambiguously."