Quite simply, where is the…

Quite simply, where is the science to support the proposed changes? MNRF has a talented pool of science staff with expertise on this topic. MNRF has a longgggg history as a science-based organization. So - show us the science that leads one to the management decision to implement hunting for cormorants. I have no idea whether to support or refute the proposed plan because there is zero transparency regarding the scientific basis for the plan. Have followed MNRF management actions for decades this is a new low - trying to push something out without a clear scientific basis. I can only assume this is entirely political and contrary to how MNRF operates (or has operated until now).