Commentaire
Comments on Bill 66 - Proposed Open For Business Planning Tool
Based on years of experience dealing with the shortcomings of an application to re-open an old toxic landfill in:
• class one wetland
• in Carolinian forest
• on land that was part of the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee,
I am extremely alarmed with Bill 66 – in particular Schedule 10 and the Proposed Open for Business Planning Tool
My volunteer experience in dealing with this old landfill site made me aware of the current shortcomings and the limited resources and power of the the Ontario Government and the municipality to protect sensitive land from actions of a company which had short-term financial gain as its priority. I shudder to think of what damage the “Open for Business by-laws” would to the protective, though weak, infrastructure that is in place.
I treasure Ontario's Green Belt areas and am deeply disturbed to think that regulations protecting precious and limited Farm land will be downloaded to municipalities.
The speed with which this Bill 66 is being pushed through negates decades of work done by this province to protect source water, natural heritage, farmland and human health and well-being. This Bill 66 will rip apart the financial resources that the people of this province have invested in legislation and the human resources. The knowledge of the people in the Ministries involved cannot be under-rated.
As a registered nurse, I witnessed firsthand the devastation caused by the Harris government's “Common Sense Revolution”, when cuts were drastically made – especially in the community. As a province, we have never recovered from that damage.
This proposed legislation demonstrates a deep disrespect for the people of Ontario and future generations.
I plead with the Government to stop this Bill and its sweeping repercussions.
Liens connexes
Soumis le 17 janvier 2019 5:42 PM
Commentaire sur
Proposition de règlement municipal sur l’aménagement ouvert aux affaires
Numéro du REO
013-4125
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
19149
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire