I'm all in favour of doing…

I'm all in favour of doing what we can to ensure "positive outcomes for species at risk" but the wording of this proposal makes me wonder if positive outcomes for economic development is actually the main purpose. We should be able to develop the economy without putting species at risk at further risk.

In reference to this proposal, and that about the cormorant hunting season, and that about Schedule 10 or Bill 66, I would like to point out:

1) In North America, we have learned the hard way that we need to take care of the environment we live in, and not soil our own nest - or anyone else's nest for that matter.

2) If we are not very careful, we will soon be a species at risk, too. Like species at risk, we live in the environment as well, and we need to protect it for our own long-term benefit as well.

Please do your utmost to ensure the sustainability of the environment for the health and well-being of your descendants and the other beings we share the world with.