Commentaire
I do not support this proposal as written. In particular the following changes concern me :
- Expanding the determine an at risk species by looking at it’s status outside Ontario. This does not appear to me to be a reasonable way to protect our ecosystems inside Ontario and could result in us losing species in our province and upsetting the balance that depends on it here.
- Allowing non-scientist aka community members to determine what species are at risk. This could lead to biased and unreasoned choices as to what species truly need protection.
- I see no reasonable reason why the Minister should be given the ability to suspend protections for *three* years at what amounts to their discretion. This seems rife with danger from lobby groups and other parties who may have interests at stake. A properly classified at risk species could go extinct in this period, and although there is a provision for this, it is unclear how it would be reliably determined in advance that a species could survive the waiting period.
- Allowing developers to essentially buy out the need to adhere to protections for at risk species is problematic at best. Even assuming the money would actually be put into a fund and used for general programs for protection, which is very vague, it is unclear how this would be applied to ‘offset’ the damages ‘purchased’ by the developers
Soumis le 23 avril 2019 9:15 PM
Commentaire sur
Examen décennal de la Loi de 2007 sur les espèces en voie de disparition de l’Ontario : Modifications proposées
Numéro du REO
013-5033
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
27319
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire