Commentaire
To Whom It May Concern,
I am a licensed architect in Ontario and US jurisdictions.
Will the downloading of risk from Ontario Building Departments to Ontario Architects equate to more professional authority via statute and associated fees? Additional fees perhaps drawn from the public purse? If not, I propose the status quo be maintained. There is simply is no more room in a competitive public and private sector market to advantage the additional fees required per the proposed changes.
Were the changes to be considered in a balanced manner, it would initially be an odd co-mingling of public and private sector authority. A welcomed affect: financial disinterest from their clients' singular pursuits (yes it holds true both public and private entities are liable to overlook safety) to one which furthers Public Safety for a licensed architect and engineer to fully stand professional judgement in the Public's interest with a portion of fees drawn from the public purse. A likely dynamic: "Client A, we cannot ignore the corroded steel fire escape despite it not being in this renovation scope, in fact here is an Order to Comply for its repair.
Sincerely,
Simone Panziera
simone panziera Architect B/March
OAA:6804 MRAIC NCARB Certificate:87995
New York State Registered Architect: 40121
thinkform|architecture+interiors
unit 1 – 29 fraser ave
toronto ontario m6k 1y7, canada
881 queens blvd
kitchener ontario n2m 1a8, canada
studio +1 226 476 1428 ext.211
cell/text +1 519 998 7668
toll free +1 855 788 8824
simonep@thinkform.ca
www.thinkform.ca
Soumis le 25 novembre 2019 4:18 PM
Commentaire sur
Transformation et modernisation de la prestation des services relatifs au Code du bâtiment de l’Ontario
Numéro du REO
019-0422
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
36783
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire