Commentaire
I am supportive of this proposal. This proposal serves to remove the redundancy of two acts that cover the same items and requirements. The expertise in forest management and the requirements under the Crown Forest Sustainability Act lies within the MNRF, not the MECP. MECP staff rely so much on MNRF staff anyhow in coming to decisions on things like Individual Environmental Assessment requests that it was an unwieldy and unnecessary and inefficient effort. The CFSA provides for more than adequate assurances of sustainability of forestry activities and provides for a fair and balanced issue resolution process that greatly reduces uncertainty in planning and operations.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment, letter of support attached.
Soumis le 24 janvier 2020 10:46 AM
Commentaire sur
Modifications proposées au Règlement 334 (Dispositions générales) pris en application de la Loi sur les évaluations environnementales afin d’éliminer les chevauchements réglementaires des exigences en matière de gestion forestière en Ontario.
Numéro du REO
019-0961
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
41578
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire