Commentaire
Our concerns relate to how the proposed community benefits may increase the burden on home buyers in small urban centres and rural areas; given the lower-density forms of housing that make up these markets. Note that the CBC charges borne by home purchasers, could be magnified by the proportional share that will be paid through their home financing.
We suggest that options be considered that better reflect lower-density, primarily ground-oriented, housing that is represented in more rural areas, specifically:
i. CBC approaches that address low-rise, greenfield development;
ii. Earlier land appraisals in the process, so that they do not “tax” infrastructure investments;
iii. Stakeholder engagement framework for transparency, as is typical for other Planning Act processes.
Supporting documents
Soumis le 20 avril 2020 11:24 AM
Commentaire sur
Proposition de questions réglementaires relatives au pouvoir d’imposer des redevances pour avantages communautaires en vertu de la Loi sur l’aménagement du territoire, la Loi de 1997 sur les redevances d’aménagement et la Loi de1992sur le code du bâtiment
Numéro du REO
019-1406
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
45608
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire