I’m writing to you today in…

I’m writing to you today in support of the Greenbelt, Conservation Authorities and Ontario’s wetlands, woodlands and other natural areas.
Firstly, I am writing to state my opposition to the proposal to remove 7,400 acres of land from the Greenbelt, which was revealed on November 04.
The proposal claims that the lands removed will be "replaced" by adding land to the Greenbelt. However, much of the land that will supposedly be added is already protected. And, even if it weren’t already protected, the very possibility of "swapping out" the plots of land targeted for development destroys the permanence and certainty required for any part of the Greenbelt to function properly.
By permanently setting aside land for farming and natural heritage, the Greenbelt protects land from the intense speculation and development pressure in Southern Ontario. Without this permanent protection, agricultural land would quickly become completely unaffordable to farmers. Even raising the possibility of removing any land from the Greenbelt will create a speculative rush and intense development pressure on all the lands currently within the Greenbelt.
Currently, there is a vast supply of unused greenfield land already open for development within existing municipal boundaries (350 square kilometers as of 2019) and the current round of Official Plans awaiting approval will add 42,000 additional hectares of non-Greenbelt land to that vast stockpile.
Given that we have an extreme shortage of homes in existing neighborhoods, and a long term shortage of materials, equipment and skilled labour, squandering our resources on resource -intensive Greenbelt sprawl will mean fewer homes in the places where they're desperately needed.
Not only is this proposal bad for the health of our province and unlikely to produce any additional housing, it goes against the Premier’s word and it goes against Minister Steve Clarke’s assertion that “we’re not going to entertain any conversations about a land swap” on the Greenbelt.
In addition to my concerns about the Greenbelt, I am deeply concerned about many of the components of Bill 23 and its associated policy proposals.
Bill 23 prohibits Conservation Authorities from doing anything to prevent sprawl from causing flooding and erosion – or destroying ecology. It would leave vast swathes of Ontario’s most important habitats largely unprotected – and put Ontarians at real risk.
Proposed policy to allow “pay to slay” destruction of currently protected wetlands and woodlands, and changes to the rules that are used to identify wetlands, will cause the majority of these rare and ecologically crucial areas to be opened to development.
This Bill’s attack on regional planning is counterproductive for creating affordable homes – as well as being environmentally disastrous. Devolving planning decisions to lower-tier municipalities would produce development that is more scattered and thus much more environmentally harmful, but also more uncoordinated and expensive.
The recently passed bill also attacks Green Buildings. This bill will take the authority to require green buildings from municipalities – undoing many municipal Green Building standards that have already been developed – and undermine the affordability benefits that energy-efficient, climate-resilient buildings provide to owners and tenants.
Bill 23 will further the destruction of critical natural areas in a time of climate crisis while also failing to deliver the urban transformation – or the affordable housing – that Ontario needs.
In conclusion, please desist from removing any lands from the Greenbelt – even if they are replaced by other lands in other areas– and repeal Bill 23. Furthermore, Doug Ford has promised to not cut into the Greenbelt. there is enough space in Scarborough, Etobicoke, North York, and the surrounding cities to re-zone areas as high density residential. For example. There is significant acreage used in parking lots. Scarborough Town centre has many ground level parking lots. Some can be converted to multilevel parking and saved space used for residential towers that have underground parking. We see this in industrial area too. Small buildings have massive parking lots. If these spaces were converted to multilevel parking it would free up space to build high density residential buildings.