Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19152

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If the federal requirements were identical there would not be an additional burden in following the provincial toxic reductions act. However the provincial act requires more planning and puts a greater burden of responsibility on the industry, which is where it belongs.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19165

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for reading my comments about this proposal. I reside in Hamilton, Ontario and am very concerned about the proposal to change the Toxics Reduction Act, leaving Ontarians, wildlife, agricultural land and drinking water vulnerable to further contamination from industrial pollutants. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19211

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to declare my strong opposition to the "Planning and reporting changes under the toxics reduction program and Ontario Regulation" section of Bill 66. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19258

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Much more information is required by the public before enacting these provisions.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19308

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Breaking the promise not to open up the Greenbelt, Lake Simcoe Watershed, the Oak Ridges Moraine and source water protection areas to new development shows a fundamental disrespect to voters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19360

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill removes useful safeguards for Ontarians and their environment. The regulations are not the same as federal ones do this action markedly reduces the protection that previous legislation provided.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19410

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am very much opposed to Bill 66, in particular the changes in Schedules 5 and 10 that would weaken or even remove our current protection on water, wild life and agricultural lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19442

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a young professional living in Hamilton, and I care deeply about the Greenbelt, Lake Simcoe, the Oak Ridges Moraine and clean water. It is home to farmland, forests, watersheds and wetlands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19453

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As an Ontarian with a young family I do not support the changes outlined in this act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19476

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose this item ero 013-4235. On three counts. 1. No longer require facilities with existing toxics reduction plans to conduct reviews of those plans Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19558

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Forest Industries Association

Statut du commentaire

(The formal letter is attached) The Ontario Forest Industries Association (OFIA) thanks you for the opportunity to comment on the EBR Proposal 013-4235 – Planning and reporting changes under the toxics reduction program and Ontario Regulation 455/09. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19578

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you as a concerned retiree who lives within the Greenbelt, by the busy urban centre of Hamilton. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19599

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Federation of Agriculture

Statut du commentaire

Toxics Reduction Program Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19602

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Do not repeal this act - for the sake of the businesses themselves, new science insights and techniques are continuously developing. Without review old processes [less effective and often more expensive] would remain simply through inertia. Review is money well spent.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19615

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I object to Bill 66 Not reviewing existing plans negates opportunity for improvement and change. Out of sight out of mind- not a good policy.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19632

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I find it inconceivable that in a time when environmental protection has never been more important for the health of our community and planet that a Bill such as Bill 66 could be proposed. Now more than ever we need our greenspaces to protect our air and water quality. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19697

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not believe that this legislation will be beneficial. It is abrogating responsibility. I am concerned for the future and our children.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19750

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Rivers Alliance

Statut du commentaire

The Ontario Rivers Alliance (ORA) is a Not-for-Profit grassroots organization acting as a voice for several stewardships, organizations, individuals and Indigenous members who have come together to protect, conserve and restore healthy river ecosystems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19756

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The TRA does not duplicate the federal regulations, it supplements them. It should not be repealed. Lire davantage