Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14394

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Not only is this destroying the environment, but it's also costing the taxpayers money! Red tape is there because, without it, people will die and their health, safety, and security will be put in danger! And all of that costs the taxpayers money, on top of that! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14401

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is an incredibly stupid and irresponsible plan, not to mention one that directly contradicts the Ontario PC’s campaign promises to leave the greenbelt alone. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14410

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

If you think that reducing workers rights and safety will bring jobs back, or reducing the future ability for our kids to have clean environments, will make this province open is insulting. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14414

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Are you kidding?? You greedy, greedy people. Do you even give thought to your own children? I know your the party of "If I don't need it, then neither do you!" but this has gotten out of hand. You are willing to sell out your own children. Sick.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14415

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Restoring Ontario's competitiveness? When did we lose it? If attracting businesses to Ontario was this government's concern, one of its first moves in office would not have been to cancel billions of dollars worth of green energy initiatives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14417

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is not acceptable to put health, the environment, and the lives of children at risk for potential economic gain. These regulations were put in place to avoid tragedies like Walkerton and the deaths of children at daycares, to ensure worker safety, and to protect what green space we have left. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14419

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

NO. YOU DO NOT PUT OUR ENVIRONMENT, OUR SAFETY, OUR HEALTH, AT RISK. DID YOU LEARN NOTHING FROM THE ROMANIAN LETTUCE DEBACLE IN THE SOUTH? NO.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14420

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It has come to my attention that Bill 66 directly cuts spending to labour regulation, child protection, clean water safeguards, and the greenbelt legislation the provincial Progressive Conservatives promised on the campaign trail they would protect “in its entirety.” This does not bring back competi Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14422

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill would negatively affect our health, safety, and the environment and should not be passed, or should be heavily reconsidered. The "red tape" that is intended to be cut exists for a reason

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14426

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Exemptions from clean water regulations are deeply concerning. As a resident near Walkerton at the time of the E. coli crisis, I remember what happens without these regulations. As a medical student and future physician, I know how contaminants in the water supply can devastate the human body. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14428

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Employment Standards Act poster should still be posted for employees to see. Young workers, immigrants and new workers need to have things made clear for them, as opposed to given in a packet. Workers need to know what their rights/expectations are- and for transparency sake from employers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14431

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

this bill sends a clear message that Ford cares more about big companies and polluters than protecting citizens, workers, and the environment. Get your priorities straight.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14445

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

An acting government is a steward to the province for a period of time. A steward acts to protect the area that it resides over, ensuring the long term sustainability and success of it long after that government has changed hands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14451

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to see how Bill 66 incorporates protection for environmentally sensitive areas such as Natural Heritage Features identified in the Planning Act. Specifically, how will Bill 66 prevent the reduction of important green spaces such as eco-corridors, forest and wetlands? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14453

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I hope this includes the Niagara Escarpment Area. The rules set out by the Niagara Escarpment Commission are overbearing and completely un reasonable. My family century old inherited land is deemed un-usable by the NEC. There is nothing special about my 50 acres. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

14458

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The clean water act was set up to prevent another Walkerton TRAGEDY! How can you possibly think this is a good idea to get rid of environmental protections?! People's health and their LIVES are literally on the line here! Lire davantage