Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19861

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Hamilton Public Health Services - Healthy Environments Division

Statut du commentaire

January 20, 2019 Provincial Planning Policy Branch c/o Ken Peterson 777 Bay Street 13th Floor Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Re: Environmental Registry Comments from Healthy Environments Division, City of Hamilton for Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018 Dear Sir/Madame, Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19862

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to Bill 66. Doug Ford says he will listen to the people, then why is he not hearing what we're saying. Protect our land, water and air. We only have one home, and that is earth.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19863

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

In order to remain sustainably competitive with longevity into the future, the province requires better long term, well structured and strong legislation in true matters of future stability, such as environmental health. As a resource-based economy (Randall & Ironside, 1996). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19865

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would think anyone living in Ontario in fact anyone living should be concerned about the environment not just for themselves but for their families and for future generations. We should at the very least keep strict checks and balances in place not reduce or eliminate them. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19869

Commentaire fait au nom

THE PRESERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS SOCIETY

Statut du commentaire

The following letter to the Chair of the Regional Municipality of Niagara and Council, reflects the views of The Preservation of Agricultural Lands Society (PALS) on Bill 66 Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act 2018 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19871

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please consider the environment and sensitive areas - Greenbelt (Oak Ridges Moraine) as a priority. Preserving our environment is more important in the long term than immediate business improvement and employment considerations. There is far too much development in York Region at this time! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19873

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is equal parts foolish and reckless. Instead of continuing to sustainably attract and retain new talent and employment in urban cores, especially Toronto, the province proposes that its 'economic growth' should be driven by land-intensive, sprawl-inducing production-based employment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19875

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop Bill 66, help protect our water, agriculture and natural areas. Don't prioritize for-profit development at the expense of our health and environment. Thank you.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19876

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I wish to object to the current formulation of Bill 66, both for what I view as its general effect of using omnibus legislation to enable the effective repeal of selected current legislation which currently helps protect the interest of common people, in favour of development interests, and for the Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19877

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The protected area of the Greenbelt and that throughout Ontario is crucial for the health and quality of life of Ontarians. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19879

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Opening the green belt to more housing is an excellent way of paying off the construction industry for its fabulous financial support of Doug Ford. The open for business idea is a simple pork-barrel payoff.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19881

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly opposed to the proposed legislation included in Bill 66, which would dramatically jeopardize the well-being and health of all Ontario citizens. I understand that the Conservative government is keen to create more economic opportunities with the “open-for-business” planning tool. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19883

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Don't gut environmental protections at a critical time for the climate just to "save a few dollars." This is insane. This government will live in infamy for generations.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19885

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to question the validity of the statement saying several of these agricultural acts are "out of date" are going to be removed as opposed to updated? I fear these changes and cuts will remove protection from the extremely important Canadian environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19887

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

During the election, you, Doug Ford, and your other candidates promised to protect the Greenbelt. You also recently released a “Made in Ontario” Environment Plan which made the same commitment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19889

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Conservative plan seems to be going backwards. When so many municipalities/levels of government/agencies/etc. are making great efforts to "be green", why would Ford and company be trying to repeal the current cap and trade? This doesn't seem logical to me. I am firmly against this.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19892

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is awful. We should not open up the Green Belt areas for development proposed under this bill. I do not support this bill and want to see protection of the Green Belt maintained.