Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19959

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Every single time our elected officials decide to weaken or eliminate safeguards and protections people end up getting sick or injured, or die. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19962

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to you to ask that you keep your promise to protect the Greenbelt and therefore call back legislature and introduce a new Bill 66 that stops the attacks on the Greenbelt, Oak Ridges Moraine, Lake Simcoe, Source Water Protection Areas and other important protected farm and natural areas Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19964

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing because I am opposed to “Bill 66, Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018” along with the proposed regulations associated with the “Open-for-business planning tool” My expertise is in archaeology and cultural heritage management and these proposals could negatively, and dramatical Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19966

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 should not allow for development of the Greenbelt. Municipalities should not be given this power. In fact, no government should. I don’t want the Greenbelt - home to 5,500 farms, 78 species at risk and 102 million tonnes of carbon storage - carved up with factories and subdivisions. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19968

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I don't see how the proposed amendments can be considered "for the people" unless "the people" are limited to those who find current regulations inconvenient, and who would see improved profits if current protections were to be relaxed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19970

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose this bill. It gives more power to businesses at the expense of employees / citizens. This bill weakens environmental safeguards at a time that we need to be strengthening them. We need to ensure that we have clean water and do not allow more pollution by weakening regulation and oversight

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19971

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Everybody knows the dice is loaded in favour of greed. There are diseases of greed and self interest among us as individuals and as nations that are ageless,so much so that we can hardly imagine what the true harmony of the earth sounds like. Quote J Philip Newell Lyric Leonard Cohen

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19972

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 10 of Bill 66 needs to be amended by adding the following to the list in the new proposed subsection 34.1(6) of the Planning Act: “Section 13 of the Niagara Escarpment Planning and Development Act” Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19975

Commentaire fait au nom

Ontario Municipal Water Association (OMWA)

Statut du commentaire

To: The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario, the Honourable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs, and Honourable Rod Phillips, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks. Re: Bill 66, the Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act, 2018/ EBR Registry number 013-4293 Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19976

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Dear Mr . Helfinger, Please find enclosed my comments regarding Bill 66, The proposed legislation would override critical requirements, under several provincial laws and policies that are designed to protect water, farmland, natural heritage and human health. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19980

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support the submission of BurlingtonGreen Environmental Association with respect to Bill 66. Yours, Burlington, Ontario resident, 39 y-o male Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19986

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This would be moving in absolutely the wrong direction! Listen to the scientists who know about the environment, including the commissioner you are firing. Try to look beyond the profit of a year or two to the sustainability of the environment for a generation or two.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19987

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do NOT move forward with Bill 66. As custodians of the land for future generations, it is not our right to destroy it before they inherit it.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19989

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have mixed feelings about Bill 66. I am concerned that if businesses circumvent the Clean Water Act, our water quality could be compromised. I am also adamant that the Great Lakes Protection Act should be respected. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19991

Commentaire fait au nom

Conservation Ontario

Statut du commentaire

Please see the attached document which outlines Conservation Ontario's comments on the proposed Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act (EBR#013-4293), the Proposed Open-for-business Planning Tool (EBR#013-4125), and the proposed New Regulation under the Planning Act for open-for-business p Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

19994

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is only going to put us back from decades of hard work to making the environment a better and safe place. My family does not approve of this bill. The green belt is a place of peace and nature, not one for factories. Lire davantage