Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20312

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill is short-sided and dangerous. Preserve the greenspace for farmland and natural habitat and retrofit land that has already been developed in order to improve human habitats!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20315

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This comment is with respect to Schedule 5 of the proposed Bill 66, to cancel the Toxic Reductions Act. Introduction Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20318

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Let's keep enforcing regulations that protect our health, our heritage, and the environment instead of removing them to make the 1% more wealthy. I don't think that having the support of less than two-fifths of Ontario voters should give our leaders the power to put our lives at risk.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20319

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Over the last two decades Ontario has developed a well thought out and comprehensive environmental safety net. This bill would rip major holes into this protection. In the 90s when Mike Harris was in government there were little environmental protection laws and people DIED due to this negligence. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop Bill 66. Don’t let developer to: Pave over the Greenbelt with factories and sprawling subdivisions. Ignore the laws that protect our clean and safe drinking water. Threaten the protection of Lake Simcoe and the Oak Ridges Maraine. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20327

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20328

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I oppose Bill 66 as it relates to Schedule 10, i.e. Allow municipalities to permit the use (i.e., zone the lands) without having to strictly adhere to existing local requirements (e.g., official plan and zoning); Remove the application of a separate approval process for site plan control; Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20329

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 — specifically Section 10 — makes it too easy for municipalities to bypass a number of Acts that were put in place to protect our environment, including the Greenbelt and Lake Simcoe. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20330

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to ask you to remove Schedules 5 and 10 from the proposed Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018. These sections needlessly threaten essential health and safety protection for Ontario residents. Schedule 5 repeals needed controls on toxic substances. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20331

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill is for people who don’t drink water or breathe air. Please consider the cost to health of future generations and the exorbitant price to clean up pollution that would be caused by this short sited bill. Do not pass this bill.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about this legislation and how it was brought forward right before the Legislature rose for the Christmas/Winter break. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20333

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am completely outraged at the proposed Bill 66 and the government that did the proposing. With Doug Ford heading it, it does not surprise me. He hasn’t changed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20334

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Economic development should not take presidence over the environment. Are we learning nothing from the dire warning we are receiving about the state of our environment. Having a great economy will do nothing for our children and grandchildren if they can not live full and healthy lives. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20335

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do NOT support Bill 66, as it threatens to erode our environment, human health, and democracy. Once we degrade our environment there is no going back, and I do not support short term profits over the long term sustainability of our communities and our planet for all.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20338

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am against Proposed Bill 66: Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act threatens our environment, our water, our air, our health.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20340

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There are no 'barriers to planning' - there are regulations which serve to ensure that valuable and important environmental, cultural, landscape, wildlife and heritage issues are given the full weight they deserve. These planning considerations affect the well-being of all residents of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20345

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.