Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20449

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The significance that the current provincial government is placing on Bill 66 and labeling it ‘Open for Business' is misleading and lacking in real detail. The specifics of what is being proposed are deliberately being withheld. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20450

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20451

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to provide a number of points of concern I have regarding Bill 66: -the omnibus approach the bill takes by lumping together amendments that affect a large number of acts and industries Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20452

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The significance that the current provincial government is placing on Bill 66 and labeling it ‘Open for Business' is misleading and lacking in real detail. The specifics of what is being proposed are deliberately being withheld. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20453

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill destroys years of bi-partisan collaborative work with environmental groups and concerned citizens. It is not about competitiveness. There are "employment lands" available in surplus. This is Doug Ford and the Conservative party paying back developers for their funding. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20454

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please reconsider schedule 10...our land, water and air need the protections this provides. Truly consider the costs to our future selves...we as a community only have certain parts of this province that are untainted...why can't we keep it that way, once it's gone, it's gone forever. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20456

Commentaire fait au nom

Land Over Landings Inc.

Statut du commentaire

Please see our full submission in the attached letter. The main points we make in our letter are as follows: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20457

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This Bill 66 is leading Ontario in the wrong direction, we want to be more sustainable not repeal on important laws and regulations made to PROTECT people such as the Clean Water Act, that was made because of the Walkerton tragedy, may I remind you. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20459

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario's Greenbelt needs to continue to be protected. It cannot be compromised. Residential and industrial growth is already reducing Ontario's natural land and habitats. There needs to be greater protection for Canada's land, not less. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20460

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Restoring Ontario’s competitiveness?? Could that be a more ridiculous title for a bill proposing to take us in completely the wrong direction? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20461

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Doug Ford I support you most of the time unfortunately I do not support Bill 66 I invite you at any time to come and have a drink of tap water here in Tottenham and you will see and taste the residents concerns.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20462

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel that it is wrong to allow the municipalities to do as they want without having to consult the people it affects. Bill 66 can allow changes that can be harmful for our environment. Municipalities should not be able to bypass provincial legislation and allow no appeal process. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20469

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I have concerns that I wish for my Provincial representatives to understand and voice on my behalf, regarding Bill 66. My concerns are regarding the QUALITY that will remain in Ontario with what is referred to as "Restoring Ontario’s Competitiveness Act" as it is currently presented. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20470

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 is going to ruin the environment of the Province of Ontario. It's purpose would appear to be Premier Ford's rich friends richer. it has nothing to do for the good of the people of Ontario. It should be tossed.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20471

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is outrageous. “Removing Red Tape,” basically means making it easier for Doug Ford’s friends to make money by further exploiting the environment, and in this case even children. Just two of the many steps backwards are: -repealing the toxics reduction act Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20472

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I'm writing to voice my strong opposition to this proposal, Bill 66, Restoring Ontario's Competitiveness Act, 2018 and request that the Government of Ontario vote it down. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

20473

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

From someone who became ill during the Walkerton Water Crisis, along with other family members who continue to suffer lasting kidney and heart damage ... I do not support Bill 66 as it is expressly designed to circumvent environmental protections and the Walkerton legacy created. Lire davantage