Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16954

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I disagree with this proposal. I work in the cultural heritage industry and many big clients have lots of money to throw into an archaeological assessment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16958

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please do not pass this bill. There are more sustainable and effective ways to make "ontario competitive". Sacrificing the health of watersystems and ecosystems will end up costing much more than any potential benefits of this bill.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16960

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I, as a citizen of Ontario am appalled at the rapid growth and urban sprawl I am witnessing! It is time to protect some of these lands from development . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16961

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Ontario has a rich history of occupation that dates back more than 12,000 years. The archaeological assessments completed each year in advance of development help fill in the gaps in the story of our Province, Indigenous Peoples and more recent settlers. Archaeology gives a voice to many who have Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16962

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am opposed to this proposed Bill 66. I fought for 15 years to protect our environment and sm appalled at what this bill would do. Please care- it's not always about the almighty dollar.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16966

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16967

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Government regulations allow to achieve a right balanace between the interests of private citizens and private businesses. I am extremely dissapointed by the deceitful stance of this Bill: under the wrapper of ‘prosperity’ transferring the stewardship of public resources to private interests. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16968

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 66 cannot be passed in this form - where it allows for local governments to destroy provincially significant and protected areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16969

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Start acting like a responsible, informed and educated government.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16971

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I will not support any law or bylaw that erodes environmental or heritage protection and in the next election I will vote against any party that passess or supports such law.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16972

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is regressive legislation that our generation and subsequent generations will regret for years to come. We need vision in government, not expediency. There are better solutions than just throwing all regulation to the wind, and other countries have proven this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16973

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This bill as written is very short sighted. Permanent damage to our ecosystems is not worth short term gain to out economy. The act undermines current environmental legislation that was made in order to protect our environment during development. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16975

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a nurse, I understand the health costs in dismantling our protections on the Greenbelt. I completely oppose any access to the Greenbelt for businesses or government profit.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16976

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Well once again it seems like your plan is to roll back our environmental protections to support our land and water if only the business can say it is creating some jobs. It does not need to be jobs vs environment! Everyone needs clean water to drink! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

16977

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Remove Schedule 10 from Bill 66, which allows municipalities to override provisions in the Greenbelt Act, Clean Water Act, Lake Simcoe Act, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act and Great Lakes Protection Act. Lire davantage