Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56942

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Wow, wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack? It honestly feels like we are stepping backwards. Time to think of future generations of humans, plants, animals.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56944

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

After decades of climate denialism from conservative politicians, are we now going to waste the next crucial ten years destroying our boreal carbon sink, shilling for small nuclear reactors and open pit mining coal............as pseudo solutions to the climate emergency??? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56947

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop expanding the wood pellet industry! I realize we need new jobs in Ontario but we need greener solutions. It is a fact that burning wood pellets is dirtier than coal, and we need to take bolder and more mindful action to avert the worst of the climate disaster. Ontario can do so much better.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56950

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Protect our boreal forests. Flora and fauna depend on them. Humans need to stop destroying planet earth. So far we have done a very poor job of caretaking it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56953

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Saying wood pellets are a sustainable replacement for coal and other sources of fossil fuel energy is akin to saying that we shouldn’t worry about the poison in the water cus it’s phosphorus, not mercury. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56954

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

One of the main products of Ontario’s forest biomass industry is wood pellets. Wood pellets are marketed as a clean energy alternative, but we know that wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56956

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Boosting Biomass energy is THE OPPOSITE of taking action against the climate emergency, this is accelerating towards the end of the world, whoever wants to increase biomass energy to fight climate change is either stupid or straight up insane.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56957

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Saying wood pellets are a sustainable replacement for coal and other sources of fossil fuel energy is akin to saying that we shouldn’t worry about the poison in the water cus it’s phosphorus, not mercury. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56961

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There is no climate emergency coming... we are in it NOW!!! Burning the carbon in trees for fuel is no solution at all. It doesn't matter where the CO2 originates... it all traps heat and warms the planet. Instead, put any support into ACTUALLY sustainable solutions. Michael Linehan Sooke BC

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56963

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Turning forests into pellets to be burned doesn’t provide a green alternative fuel source that reduces carbon emissions. Research shows that cutting forests releases a lot of carbon from the Forrest and forest floor. Lire davantage