Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70066

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like to express my disgust with this plan to develop the greenbelt. Ontario needs affordable housing and NOT more luxury condos. Especially when the cost exceeds finances and we lose precious ecosystems. This party is such a disappointment and a mockery of functional democracy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70072

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt and surrounding areas are forever being eroded by single-family home developers reducing our environmental/climate resistance and adding to urban sprawl that is still inaccessible to many homeowners, global warming, and stunningly bad land use per square meter. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70073

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

ENOUGH with the removal of our green space!!! This land was already previously protected and is/was the wish of the people of Ontario. What gives yourself the right, Premier Ford, to overrule the people? You are quickly turning into a fascist and the new dictator of Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70074

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As human beings we have been disregarding mother earth's warnings. Infringing and changing the natural habitat (previously protected) by building more houses (who can afford them?) is wrong. We have to pay attention. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70077

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 23 is a terrible idea full stop. The Greenbelt should never be subtracted from, if anything it should be added to. To suggest you can take from one area and add to another is sheer lunacy. The Greenbelt needs to be continuous not fragmented. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70082

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Instead of using green belt for extra house, government should support/or provide incentive to construct/Legalize the existing or nee basement apartments so that they can earn income from property tax, renovation business, and provides affordable living , extra income to owners and accommodate more Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70089

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The province's own Housing Affordability Task Force stated plainly earlier this year that a land shortage is not the cause of our housing crisis. The task force's report said there is enough land in existing built up areas and other undeveloped lands that are outside of the Greenbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70092

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Absolutely not. These lands are protected for a reason, and in particular after reading todays Toronto Star article, the corruption in Ontario government is obvious and extremely disheartening. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70096

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please stop this project. Our planet is at significant risk and this will affect our precious wetlands and wildlife that are vital to the health of our province! Keep your promise Doug!!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70099

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

There's no doubt that Toronto is notorious for its slow traffic and terrible housing market. However, it's also home to the Greenbelt, protected farms, green space, forests, and so much more that are invaluable to all Golden Horseshoe communities. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70102

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

More backroom deals? Padding the pockets of your friends and associates? No, thank you Mr. Ford. We do NOT need yet another greenspace or wetland destroyed on the alter of your ego and sacrificed to the asphalt gods. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70105

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Strongly disagree with the anti-democratic and anti-environmental implications of these 'proposed amendments'. The proposal carves 7,400 acres out of the Greenbelt for development - with an unfounded excuse that these lands are need for housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70106

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While I am all for housing development, I believe it is fundamentally not in the interests of Ontarians or of municipalities to further open up protected lands. Instead, densifying and redeveloping existing lands can achieve two main goals: Lire davantage