Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70157

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I do not under any circumstance support the removal of land from the greenbelt in order to develop housing. The supply and demand imbalance in the housing sector is a large and very real problem. But developing houses in the greenbelt is not the solution. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70161

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt should not be eroded. Destroying the land for housing has been found unnecessary as sufficient land exists within existing municipal boundaries. Several recent land acquisitions by developers are known to be friends of Doug Ford and they stand to profit from this proposal. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70171

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The greenbelt is by definition, intended to remain green, off limits to developers. It protects wildlife and waterways that affect not just the acres of land proposed for building, but the entire surrounding ecosystem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70172

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am strongly against opening up the Greenbelt for development. We should instead upzone existing land. This is more cost effective since suburban sprawl is low density, meaning it costs a large amount per person for public services. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70181

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-ontarios-greenbelt-is-supposed-to-be-a-protected-legacy-not-a-reserve/ [of land just waiting to be paved over] Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70182

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm a Farmer's Daughter....save our farmland. Our children will need the Conservation Lands and we need the trees for the oxygen. Don't build roads through our farmland and greenlands!!!!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70189

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Building housing on the green belt will not solve the province’s housing crisis. I have spent my entire career in real estate, having worked on $4B of real estate deals in North America, including more that 4,000 housing units. The idea what housing and the environment are at odds are a false one. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70191

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A promise was made by Doug Ford to protect the Greenbelt. Please keep that promise and allow future generations to enjoy some green spaces in the midst of urban sprawl. It is important for our mental health to have areas where we can go and just enjoy nature. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70201

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Stop sacrificing environmental protections for “growth”. Climate change is real. Opening the Greenbelt for further development is a horrible plan, and it is not a smart solution to address housing problems in the GTA. It primarily serves to benefit the developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70204

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Please find another way to help housing that is actually proven to work. Sprawl is harmful and ineffective. This will not help our housing crisis. The Green Belt was put in place to be protected land against decisions exactly like this one. The soil in this area is excellent for growing food. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70205

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The parcels of Land which were chosen for the Greenbelt were chosen for a reason. You cannot simply cut away and paste in new land to restore some kind of acreage balance. That simply is not how the environment works. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70206

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I believe from the information I have read, Premier Doug Ford illegally advised his donors, friends, business associates ahead of time to purchase land on the Greenbelt with his promise of changing the Zoning, enabling him to build a Highway on it. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70208

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

At this time when we are dealing with more and more climate issues, we need action to protect the wetlands and green space. Instead our government is going in the opposite direction. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

70210

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely against the plans to remove lands from the greenbelt for development. This plan is short-sighted and will result in more urban sprawl. Bill 23 won't benefit anyone but developers, as there's no actual incentives for building affordable housing. Lire davantage