Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73780

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Ford government needs to find a different plan to build more houses that does not include gutting the greenbelt, especially in light of the fact they ignored reports that showed building on the greenbelt would not solve the housing problems. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73783

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This greenbelt plan not help with housing, instead it will destroy the environment. Loosening environmental protections is not the right approach to build houses. Focus on building more higher occupancy housing in cities and suburbs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73785

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The destruction of the green belt and loosening of environmental protections will not help Canadians with housing issues, it will only put money in the pocket of developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73786

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Changes to the Greenbelt should not be considered. As Toronto and the GTA grow into a larger mega city the green space is precious. It is not needed to build housing either. What is needed is a proper use of the available land of which there is plenty. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73788

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is not the future that Ontarian’s need. The green belt is a significant natural infrastructure piece that should be left as is. There are better ways to improve housing availability that do not involve selling the future quality of life of our children and grandchildren. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73790

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am not in favour of this bill. I am not in favour of letting this conservative government wreck anything else in this province. They need to provide affordable housing in a situation that isn't back door deals with developer pals. No to the proposed amendment to the greenbelt plan.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73791

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73793

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal horrible and borderline criminal. It is insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73794

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I feel very strongly about the environment, and the proposed development of the greenbelt, which includes the Oak Ridges Moraine, is socially and environmentally wrong. The Moraine has an aquifer that provides us with needed groundwater. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73795

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This proposal will ruin the environment. There is a huge amount of endangered, threatened and at risk species that live throughout the green belt. It is protected for a reason and should stay as such. Studies show that this highway won’t help anyone. It won’t help our traffic problem. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73797

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed amendments to the greenbelt plan are idiotic. Why would we build more sprawl in an environmentally protected area (with flood planes!) when we could instead rezone and densify our existing cities? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73800

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Public lands should be for the public. Developing Greenbelt land will be detrimental to the environment, wildlife and anyone who uses the land in the future. Please preserve the Greenbelt for future generations by not developing housing.