Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74479

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

During the 2018 election campaign, Mr. Ford promised not to touch the Greenbelt – a vast arc of farmland, forests and wetlands across Southern Ontario. That’s a promise that he should be forced to keep. We need the Greenbelt

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74480

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am horrified by the blatant corruption of this government. The plan outlined in Bill 23 will not provide housing while simultaneously destroying lands and habitats vital for the well-being of Ontarians and Ontario. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74481

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

when the greenbelt was introduced and a plan set up for the monitoring and protection of these areas i was so proud and pleased that gov't was working in the public interest. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74483

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I would like the Greenbelt to remain protected. Let's build homes with high density and nearby public transit within cities where available, instead of building more sprawl that nobody asked for. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74484

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is greatly concerning that this legislation was put into place that has a clear connection to PC party donors. The corruption associated with this legislation will forever stain Ontario, and will put municipalities at financial risk, and Ontarians at risk of further homelessness. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74485

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Not only are our green lands important and should be protected, but spreading housing across more land will only hurt the walkability of already car dependant suburbs. We should be building upwards, not outwards, and focusing on good urban planning over the development of precious natural land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74487

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Build affordable mid density housing on or close to existing public transit nodes. Keep farmland available for feeding expected increase in population. With climate and water issues in California we must protect and support our own local food supply.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74491

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

(1) You are enriching developers on the backs of current homeowners. Passing development costs along by forcing municipalities to raise property taxes is wrong. Your government has declared war on homeowners and this is a fight that your government will not win. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74494

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Why are comment open until December 4th but the bill was passed November 24th? This bill does not serve the people! Developer fees are in place to pay for the infrastructure required for further developments. Why are tax payers paying this fee while developers make all the money?

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74498

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Urban sprawl is not the solution to the housing crisis. Encourage and promote development to other areas where there is: A) cheaper land B) a housing crisis C) an employment crisis (not enough employees to fill vacancies) Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74500

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

We shouldn't need to keep building outwards and into the greenbelt, we need to build upwards and into the spaces which have already been made available for housing! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74502

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

A range of concerns arise from the government's decision to develop the Greenbelt for housing: Firstly, debate in the provincial leslgislature has been cut short on the bill, an afront to democracy. There are legitimate questions around backroom dealings with developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74503

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think you know EXACTLY how most of us feel about you developing the Green Belt. We made it very clear while you were running for office. You said "the people have spoken, we have listened, we will not touch the Green Belt". Remember that? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74504

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm greatly disappointed in Ontario's plan to bulldoze through our Greenbelt to benefit developers at the cost of our environment and planet. Urban sprawl is not the answer to our housing crisis and we need to modernize our existing city boundaries with higher density housing and improved transit.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74508

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I’m not sure why this government has chosen to build in the greenbelt. It is totally unnecessary. If you want to build more houses which I totally support, you should upzone the yellowbelt. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74509

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Although I doubt this comment will change anything, as the government has already made its mind up, but I am a Conservative voter who absolutely condemns Bill C23 and the removal of Greenbelt land. How is it protected land if you are just going to reassign it? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

74511

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

This is not what the public wants. The Ford government already tried this once and backed down due to public pressure, claiming it wouldn't try again. Clearly this was a lie. Lire davantage