Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73824

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Just like in 2018, Doug Ford should be listening to the people, and governing through their voice. We do not want the Greenbelt built on. Reverse course. Stop fighting the public will. And while you're at it, repeal 124, and pay CUPE. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73826

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a young adult (late 20s) looking to buy his first house in the GTA. I disagree with and disapprove of removing or "substituting" any lands from the greenbelt. It sets a bad precedent to remove land we should be protecting for any reason. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73827

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly oppose these changes. Redesignating Greenbelt areas will cause irreparable harm. There is enough space in the existing areas for growth. We need greater density not urban sprawl. Keep the Greenbelt (as it is currently designated) green.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73828

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As someone who lives in a low-income neighborhood, there is no evidence that Bill 23 will result in affordable housing. In reality it will get rid of existing affordable housing and make new communities less safe. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73830

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This proposal is an absolute sham and borderline criminal. It is particularly insulting as it stands to enrich developpers with NO GUARANTEE of benefits to the public. PUBLIC LAND SHOULD SERVE THE PUBLIC. If it is to be developped, it should be guaranteed community housing / afforbable housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73834

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
So against this. Doug Ford is corrupt. The new owners of the land bought it just ahead of the rules changing. How? Inside influence. Shame on you for broken promises and selling off any hope of our part of the province being preserved. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73835

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
This areas that is being removed are parks and places were the community goes for there mental health, the one beside Newmarket my school took me to every year growing up. These lands are what make up Canada and the species that live in it we need to protects those. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73836

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It is shameful that the Ford government has decided to pursue this project by developing on greenbelt protected land. Due diligence studies suggested the development on this land to accommodate highway that only saves a driver 5 mins travel time. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73842

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The fact that the owners of the lands in the green belt changed hands to developers shortly before Ford's government put forth motions to allow development on said lands is clear evidence for an investigation into corruption of said government. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73843

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
It would be nice if short term minded politicians would stop selling important and/or natural assets of our province/country off in order to line their dirty pockets with cash so that they can gloat over "lowering" the debt ceiling while sitting their short length in office, get pats on the back fro Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

73848

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I've lived in Ontario for 15 years now and this has to be one of the worst plans for housing development I've seen. No affordability clauses just more urban sprawl. Your own report on the act even identifies these issues. Lire davantage