Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79166

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

It is not sustainable to keep paving over the wild areas. The green belt has been allocated to protect wildlife and the natural order of things. It has been researched and designated for the purpose of protecting humans from natural disasters. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79199

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am extremely disappointed in my Provincial Government: I consider this bill and the proposed changes to the Greenbelt to be utterly shameful. Here are my reasons: - There was no consultation with Indigenous groups, as is required by law Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79200

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned about the loss of natural heritage which is not clearly identified but, could be wetlands. Map 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 show natural heritage features being removed from the greenbelt. This removal could cause flooding or increased drought. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79211

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am concerned that this proposal is in violation of the Environmental Bill of Rights as it is connected to Bill23 which has passed as well as in violation of Federal law if there are Federally listed endangered species present or it undermines biodiversity targets.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79221

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Re: Proposed Amendments to the Greenbelt Plan (ERO 019-6216) Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed changes to the Greenbelt Plan for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79258

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed changes to the Greenbelt Plan for the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79290

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Comments on Proposed Redesignation of Land Under the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan ERO number 019-6218: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79367

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Redesignating this much land makes no sense. I did not vote for this. Doug Ford promised not to touch the Greenbelt and I expected that he would be developing higher-density options in municipalities south and north of the Greenbelt, not feeding the developers out of the palm of his hand.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79379

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello, I am writing today to submit a comment to ERO 019-6216, 019-6217, and 019-6218, pertaining to re-designation of Greenbelt lands. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79395

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I reject the rationale for the deletions proposed in this notice. The Greenbelt Plan and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan were intended to protect lands forever. Designations under these plans were not intended to be re-assigned for the convenience of developers. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79462

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my anger and opposition to the proposed changes to the lands designated in the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79464

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The Greenbelt is meant to be protected green space for the enjoyment of all. It was also meant to be protected in perpetuity. The Ford government has previously promised that this will not be touched. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79487

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

First, there is plenty of room for housing outside of the Greenbelt. There is no need to "re-jig" the Greenbelt boundaries for the purpose of building homes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79660

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

“The Greenbelt Plan, together with this Plan and the Niagara Escarpment Plan, identifies where urbanization should not occur in order to provide permanent protection to the agricultural land base and the ecological and hydrological features, areas and functions occurring on this landscape and found Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79682

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I strongly oppose the proposed removal of lands from the Greenbelt. We should meet our housing goals by maximizing density in existing urban and suburban settlements, where city services already exist and can be expanded upon. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

79685

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am a steward of the land where I live, I owe respect and care to the land, the creatures with which I share it, and the photo-synthesizing trees, grasses and other plants that support all life. This complex web is clearly not of concern to the current government. It is of major concern to me. Lire davantage