Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

116997

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removal of existing bike lanes is a gross overstep of provincial authority. It needs to remain under the purview of the city/local planning and the City is the best suited to handle this. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117008

Commentaire fait au nom

Friends and Families for Safe Streets

Statut du commentaire

Friends and Families for Safe Streets is a group whose loved ones were struck and killed by a motorist, and people who survived being struck with severe life-altering injuries. We are unwilling experts on the human toll exacted by dangerous road design, and car-centric laws and public policy. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117013

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The study (attached) by the Belgian institution Transport & Mobility Leuven found that if only 10% of cars on the roads got replaced by motorcycles, time stuck in traffic would decrease by a whopping 40%. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117042

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Hello. I am a young adult resident of a small town in the Durham Brock region, Beaverton. I regularly cycle to work in my home town, but also commute weekly to Oshawa for my university education. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117069

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I'm appalled that the government is planning to give itself the power to remove bike lanes that have already been planned, built and paid for by local municipalities, ostensibly to provide the most trivial reductions in driver travel time. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117071

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

My first issue with Bill 212 is the exemptions being planned for Highway 413, specifically that it will be exempt from the Environmental Assessment Act. The impact of building this highway and further encouraging driving will have grave effects on the environment. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117076

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

The proposed Bill 212 could be pretty harmful to our infrastructure and city planning. Ford wants to get rid of bike lanes on major roads in Toronto, add more lanes, and even build a highway through sensitive natural areas—all while stepping on property rights for broadband and highway expansion. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117086

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I support bike lanes. Being against them is just trying to get votes from car drivers, but it won't help congestion.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117087

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Removing bike lanes would not ease congestion. Adding more car lanes never ends up easing congestion over an extended period. The only way to solve congestion is to encourage active and public transportation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117113

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Bill 212: Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act, 2024 The purpose of this legislation is to reduce gridlock and save time for drivers in Ontario. These comments focus on Part XII, which requires Government of Ontario approval/review of: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117117

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

While Bill 212 is well intended, it will neither meaningfully reduce gridlock or traffic congestion, and will damage our environment. It must not be passed. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117122

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

As a Peterborough resident, I am deeply concerned about the implications of Bill 212, particularly its potential to reverse the progress our city has made in creating safer and more inclusive streets. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117151

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing today to indicate my strong opposition to Bill 212, not with my opinion but with data and evidence. I want Ontario to move faster, and I strongly support efforts to reduce gridlock. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117158

Commentaire fait au nom

Greenbelt Foundation

Statut du commentaire

Please find attached the submission from the Greenbelt Foundation. Thank You. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117173

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I think that building Hwy 413 would be a travesty. It would undoubtedly threaten some of Ontario’s most fertile land, and as far as I can see, it would do so needlessly. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117187

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Schedule 4, 195.2 (1) adds bureaucracy by requiring all municipalities to seek permission to install bike lanes on whatever roads could be designated as a "highway" by the Minister, and subsection 4 increases the risk of collisions at community or on local roads. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117215

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

I am writing to express my opposition to Bill 212. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

117220

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Incentivizing cycling is one element of several that should be taken to reduce the existing gridlock in our cities by reducing the number of vehicles on them. Lire davantage