Proposed regulation under the Planning Act related to inclusionary zoning

ERO number
013-1977
Notice type
Regulation
Posted by
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Notice stage
Decision
Decision posted
Comment period
December 18, 2017 - February 1, 2018 (45 days) Closed
Last updated

This consultation was open from:
December 18, 2017
to February 1, 2018

Decision summary

To address the need for better affordable housing choices, the Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016 proposed amendments to the Planning Act that would enable municipalities to use inclusionary zoning through the land-use planning system. Based on input received on this proposal, matters were considered for regulatory proposals.

Decision details

On April 12, 2018, the Inclusionary Zoning regulation (Ontario Regulation 232/18 under the Planning Act came into effect to provide regulatory direction to municipalities choosing to implement inclusionary zoning.

On April 12, 2018, amendments (Ontario Regulation 234/18) to the Community Planning Permits regulation (Ontario Regulation 173/16 under the Planning Act) also came into effect to provide municipalities the authority to use inclusionary zoning in community planning permit systems.

These regulations came into effect on the same day Sections 1, 2(2) and (4), 3(1) and (2), (4), (5), 4 to 6, and 9 to 11 of Schedule 4 to the Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016 (Bill 7) came into force, which created a comprehensive enabling framework for municipal use of inclusionary zoning under the Planning Act.

A link to Bill 7 is provided.

A to the Inclusionary Zoning regulationOntario Regulation 232/18 is provided

Links to the Community Planning Permits regulation (Ontario Regulation 173/16) and the amending regulation (Ontario Regulation 234/18) are provided:

Inclusionary Zoning regulation

The requirements of the Inclusionary Zoning regulation include:

  • Information and analyses to be included in an assessment report and that would be considered in the development of official plan policies, including an analysis of potential impacts on the housing market and on the financial viability of development
  • Requirements for official plan policies relating to inclusionary zoning
  • Requirements for the distribution of net proceeds to municipalities from the sale of affordable housing units including a limit of 50 percent of the proceeds
  • Restrictions on municipal approval of offsite units
  • Restrictions on municipalities when using s. 37 of the Planning Act with inclusionary zoning
  • Requirements for reports of municipal council to be made publicly available at least every two years
  • Exemptions from the application of inclusionary zoning for developments that:
    • contain fewer than 10 residential units
    • are proposed by not-for-profit housing providers
    • have submitted development applications before inclusionary zoning official plan policies were adopted, and
    • have applied for a building permit, a development permit, a community planning permit or approval of a site plan

Comments received

Through the registry

37

By email

0

By mail

79
View comments submitted through the registry

Effects of consultation

Consultation on the proposed approach to inclusionary zoning in Ontario took place through separate postings on the Environmental Registry:

  • Environmental Policy Proposal Notice (012-7616)
  • Environmental Registry Regulation Proposal Notice (012-7617)
  • Environmental Registry Regulation Proposal Notice (013-1977)

In respect of Environmental Registry Regulation Proposal Notice 012-7617, public consultation on the proposal for this decision was provided for 90 days, from May 18, 2016 to August 16, 2016.

As a result of public consultation on proposed regulatory content, the ministry received a total of 85 comments through on-line submissions, written correspondence or Standing Committee submissions. Five of these were submissions made directly on the Environmental Registry.

Most of these submissions combined their comments for both the Act Proposal Notice (012-7616) and the Regulation Proposal Notice (012-7617).

You can obtain a copy of all comments from the Contact person listed in this notice.

In respect of Environmental Registry Regulation Proposal Notice 013-1977, public consultation on the proposal for this decision was provided for 45 days, from December 18, 2017 to February 1, 2018.

This consultation built upon the consultation for Regulation Proposal Notice 012-7617 and provided a proposed summary of regulatory content for a proposed inclusionary zoning regulation and proposed amendments to Ontario Regulation 173/16 under the Planning Act to permit inclusionary zoning in a community planning permit system.

As a result, the ministry received a total of 116 comments through on-line submissions or written correspondence. Thirty-seven of these were submissions made directly on the Environmental Registry.

Environmental Registry posting #012-7617

Some submissions supported:

  • Inclusionary zoning as an optional tool
  • Allowing municipalities to establish affordability periods, incentives, unit set asides, target households, threshold size, price and rent levels
  • Municipal use of section 37 of the Planning Act with inclusionary zoning
  • Allowing affordable housing units to be located offsite
  • Basic requirements for administration and monitoring of affordable units
  • Provincial establishment of minimum standards;
  • Exempting inclusionary zoning policies and by-laws from appeal

Some submissions gave mixed views on:

  • Whether inclusionary zoning should be optional or mandatory
  • Use of section 37 of the Planning Act - should be restricted or not used with inclusionary zoning
  • Affordability periods – some support for a minimum 20 year period while others suggest longer periods including perpetuity

Some submissions raised concerns regarding:

  • Whether inclusionary zoning should take place in Ontario
  • Whether inclusionary zoning should be a partnership model between the public and private sector
  • Lack of clarity around funding and who administers the affordable housing units
  • Applying the same inclusionary zoning rules to urban and rural areas
  • The province’s definition of “affordable” with suggestions to review the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 to include a “core needs” threshold
  • The role that money in lieu of affordable housing units could play

This consultation informed the development of a summary of proposed regulatory content set out in Environmental Registry Posting 013-1977.

Environmental Registry posting 013-1977

The municipal and housing sectors along with interested individuals, expressed considerable concern with the proposed inclusionary zoning regulation, primarily in respect of the following proposals:

  • The threshold of 20 units or greater was considered too high and overly prescriptive
  • Maximum 5% general unit set aside and 10% set aside in high density transit areas were considered too low and represent a missed opportunity
  • A 20 to 30 year affordability period - considered too short and would not address housing affordability for the next generation
  • The 40% municipal contribution to offset the cost of affordable housing units was considered too high and the proposed measures that municipalities could use to satisfy the contribution were too restrictive
  • Exemption of purpose-built rental units – the focus on ownership would make it too difficult for municipalities to identify and direct growth to meet their needs (ownership or rental)

In general most submissions from individuals, municipalities and the housing sector indicated that greater municipal flexibility was needed so that inclusionary zoning could be tailored to local needs and circumstances.

The development sector was generally supportive of the partnership approach and framework proposed for inclusionary zoning. However, the sector generally felt that a 50/50% split would have better ensured that the private sector market projects would remain economically viable.

The Inclusionary Zoning regulation (Ontario Regulation 232/18) includes revised provisions related to the following proposals:

  • the requirements of an assessment report were expanded to include an analysis of the potential impacts on the housing market and on the financial viability of development or redevelopment in the municipality related to inclusionary zoning by-laws, and a written opinion of the analysis from a person independent of the municipality
  • the requirements for official plan policies were revised and expanded to include the approach for authorizing inclusionary zoning, including:
    • Size of development (not fewer than 10) to which an inclusionary zoning by-law would apply
    • Unit set aside
    • Affordability period
    • Measures and incentives
    • How price or rent of affordable housing units would be determined
    • Approach to determining percentage of net proceeds to be distributed to a municipality
    • Circumstances for permitting units to be located offsite
    • Circumstances in which an offsite unit would be considered in proximity of the development from which the offsite unit was transferred
    • Procedure to monitor affordable housing units to ensure affordability over the municipally-specified affordability period
  • The share of net proceeds that may be distributed to a municipality from the sale of an affordable housing unit was limited to 50%
  • Offsite units are prohibited unless there are official plan policies setting out the municipal approach and subject to specific restrictions
  • Municipal authority under s. 37 of the Act is restricted when used with inclusionary zoning
  • Exemption of developments from the application of inclusionary zoning by-laws were clarified and not-for-profit housing developments were expanded to include specified developments where the not-for-profit housing provider was in a partnership with a for-profit development

The Community Planning Permits regulation (Ontario Regulation 173/16) allows all local municipalities to use the community planning permit system, and sets the minimum requirements for use of the system. It was amended under Ontario Regulation 234/18 to authorize municipal use of inclusionary zoning in community planning permit systems.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Provincial Planning Policy Branch
Address

777 Bay Street
13th floor
Toronto, ON
M5G 2E5
Canada

Office phone number

Connect with us

Contact

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice

Original proposal

ERO number
013-1977
Notice type
Regulation
Posted by
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Proposal posted

Comment period

December 18, 2017 - February 1, 2018 (45 days)

Proposal details

Description of regulation

The Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016 (Bill 7) was introduced on September 14, 2016 and received Royal Assent on December 8, 2016. Schedule 4 of Bill 7 amended the Planning Act to enable municipalities to adopt official plan policies and to pass zoning by-laws related to inclusionary zoning. Subsections 2(1) and (3) and 3(3) and Sections 7 and 8 of Schedule 4 of Bill 7 came into force on the day Royal Assent was given. Otherwise, Schedule 4 would come into force on a day to be named if proclaimed.

The legislation would, if proclaimed, also enable the Minister to make regulations under the Planning Act to provide direction on a variety of matters related to inclusionary zoning.

This summary sets out the proposed regulatory content related to inclusionary zoning if Schedule 4 is proclaimed.

Summary of Proposed Regulatory Content:

  1. Prescribed Official Plan policies – An official plan that contains policies described in subsection 16(4) would be required to include provisions for matters that would:
    1. provide that zoning by-laws giving effect to the policies described in subsection 16(4) could only apply to developments or redevelopments that propose no less than twenty (20) residential units;
    2. identify locations and areas in the municipality that may be appropriate for inclusionary zoning by-laws; and
    3. identify the range of household incomes for which inclusionary zoning by-laws could provide for affordable housing units;
    4. identify an approach to setting an average market price for each proposed unit type that may be required to be provided as affordable housing units in an inclusionary zoning by-law. The average market price may vary across different locations within the municipality. The average market price would be updated annually.
  2. Municipal Assessment Report – A municipal assessment report that would be required to be prepared prior to adopting official plan policies authorizing inclusionary zoning, would be required to contain the following:
    1. Information relating to current and projected trends for housing needs including:
      1. municipal demographics and population (e.g., age distribution, population growth);
      2. anticipated household characteristics (e.g., household sizes and types);
      3. anticipated household income;
      4. existing and planned housing supply; and
      5. housing affordability analysis; and
    2. information, including any documentation, relating to an analysis of the average market price for each proposed unit type that may be required to be provided as affordable housing units, taking into consideration location within the municipality
    3. Any updated assessment report would also include the above information and documentation.
  3. Provisions Required in Inclusionary Zoning By-laws – An inclusionary zoning by-law would be required to include provisions regarding the following matters:
    1. Unit Set Aside – The total number of affordable housing units or the total gross floor area proposed to be occupied by the affordable housing units that could be required:
      1. would not exceed five (5) percent of the total units or would not exceed five (5) percent of the total gross floor area of a proposed development or redevelopment to which the by-law applies; or
      2. if a development or redevelopment is proposed to be located in a high density transit-station area identified in an official plan, would not exceed ten (10) percent of the total units or would not exceed ten (10) percent of the total gross floor area of a proposed development or redevelopment to which the by-law applies; and
      3. a definition of total gross floor area of a proposed development or redevelopment would be considered as the total gross floor area of the total residential units not including the total gross floor area of the common areas;
    2. Affordability Period
      1. for a period of no less than 20 years and no greater than 30 years from the date of its first occupancy, each affordable housing unit in a proposed development or redevelopment would be maintained as affordable as determined by the by-law; and
      2. for a period of no greater than 10 years following the period referred to in clause (i), each affordable housing unit would be maintained as affordable solely in respect of the proposed price and sale provisions set out in clause 3 (d)(ii) and clause 4(iii) of this Regulation Proposal Notice;
    3. Measures and Incentives
      1. where a development or redevelopment is on land subject to a community planning permit system, no measures or incentives would be required to be provided; or
      2. Where a development or redevelopment is not on land subject to a community planning permit system, the measures and incentives would be a financial contribution paid by the municipality to the development or redevelopment;
      3. The financial contribution would be calculated using the formula,

        (A - B) x 0.4

        in which,

        A = the total sum of the average market price for all of the affordable housing units required in clause 3(a) above;
        B = the total sum of the affordable price for all of the affordable housing units required in clause 3(a) above;

        and where,

        average market price would mean the average market price set out in the official plan policies; and

        affordable price would mean the affordable price determined in the by-law.
      4. where a financial contribution would be required as a measure and incentive, such financial contribution could be satisfied through one or more of the following:
        1. a waiver or reduction in planning application fees in respect of a development or redevelopment including fees associated with applications made under s. 22, s. 34, s. 41 and s. 51;
        2. a reduction in parking requirements for the proposed development or redevelopment;
        3. an exemption from the requirement for payment of all or part of the parkland cash-in-lieu applicable to the development or redevelopment; and
        4. an exemption from all or part of the development charges that may be applied to the development or redevelopment;
      5. For clarity, a financial contribution could not be satisfied through an increase in height or density for the proposed development or redevelopment;
    4. Price
      1. during the affordability period referred to in clause (b)(i) above, the price of an affordable housing unit at which the unit may be sold would be determined by the by-law; and
      2. for the period of time referred to in clause (b)(ii) above, the sale price of an affordable housing unit would be at market rate.
  4. Provisions Required in Inclusionary Zoning Agreements - Share of Proceeds Related to Equity – An agreement between an owner of lands, buildings or structures to be developed or redeveloped and the municipality would be required to include the provisions about the following matters:
    1. During the affordability period referred to in clause 2(b)(i) above, the owner of the affordable housing unit and the municipality would share, on a basis as determined by by-law, in the proceeds related to the equity of an affordable housing unit, if any, that may arise from the sale of an affordable housing unit; and
    2. During the ten (10) year period referred to in clause 2(b)(ii) above, the owner of the affordable housing unit and the municipality would share in the proceeds related to the equity of an affordable housing unit, if any, that may arise from the first sale within the ten (10) year period, on the following basis:
      1. the owner has owned the unit for two (2) years or less - 10% of the proceeds to the owner, 90% of the proceeds to the municipality;
      2. the owner has owned the unit for more than two (2) years and less than five (5) years - 20% of the proceeds to the owner, 80% of the proceeds to the municipality;
      3. the owner has owned the unit for more than five (5) years and less than ten (10) years - 30% of the proceeds to the owner, 70% of the proceeds to the municipality;
      4. the owner has owned the unit for more than ten (10) years and less than fifteen (15) years - 50% of the proceeds to the owner, 50% of the proceeds to the municipality; and
      5. the owner has owned the unit for more than fifteen (15) years and less than twenty (20) years - 75% of the proceeds to the owner, 25% of the proceeds to the municipality; and
      6. the owner has owned the unit for twenty (20) or more years – 90% of the proceeds to the owner, 10% of the proceeds to the municipality.
    3. There would be no share in the proceeds related to the equity of an affordable housing unit between the municipality and the owner for any sale after the first sale referred to in clause 2(b)(ii) above;
    4. For the purposes of this section, equity and proceeds related to the equity means the difference between the price at which the owner paid for the purchase of the affordable housing unit and the price at which the owner sold the affordable housing unit, less any remaining mortgage payments owed by the owner at the time of the sale, and less all reasonable costs related to the sale.
  5. Reporting by council of a municipality – A report documenting the status of the affordable housing units would be required every two years from the date of passing of the first inclusionary zoning by-law and such report would be required to include the following information:
    1. the number of affordable housing units secured in relation to the income of the households;
    2. the types of affordable housing units secured (e.g., studio, 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom);
    3. the location of the units; and
    4. the number of affordable units that returned to market units; and
    5. the total amount of the share of proceeds related to equity received by the municipality from the sale of affordable housing units.
  6. Restrictions on off-site – The authority to permit the inclusionary zoning units to be located on lands, building or structures other than those that are the subject of the proposed development or redevelopment would be subject to the following restrictions:
    1. the offsite units must be located in proximity to the development from which the units are being transferred;
    2. the land on which the offsite units would be situated must be zoned for inclusionary zoning unless the development or redevelopment is proposed by a non-profit housing provider;
    3. the offsite units shall be ready for occupancy no later than thirty-six (36) months after the transfer of the affordable units from the proposed principal development;
    4. the offsite units cannot count towards the satisfaction of any inclusionary zoning requirements to which the offsite development would otherwise be subject; and
    5. no more than 50 percent of the units in the offsite development may be inclusionary zoning units.
  7. Restrictions on use of s. 37 – the authority to use s. 37 with respect to the development or redevelopment with inclusionary zoning would be subject to the following restrictions:
    1. the affordable housing units or the gross floor area proposed to be occupied by the affordable housing units that could be required in clause 3(a) above, could not be used to determine community benefits under s. 37;and
    2. s. 37 would not apply where a development or redevelopment with inclusionary zoning is proposed to be located on lands within an area where a community planning permit system is in effect.
  8. Developments or Redevelopments – would be exempted from the application of an inclusionary zoning by-law where:
    1. an application was made under the Planning Act for approval of a development or redevelopment that proposes to be built for the purposes of residential rental units;
    2. an application was made under the Planning Act by a non-profit housing provider as defined in the regulation;
      1. A definition for a non-profit housing provider could include the following:
        1. a registered charity in good standing with the Canada Revenue Agency; or
        2. a corporation incorporated as a not-for-profit organization without share capital under federal or provincial not-for-profit, corporate or cooperative legislation;
    3. an application for a building permit, development permit or community planning permit, or site plan approval for a development or redevelopment was made before the day that an inclusionary zoning by-law was passed that applies to the area in which the development or redevelopment proposes to be built; and
    4. concurrent applications accepted by a municipality and were made for approval of an official plan amendment, a zoning by-law amendment, and either a site plan, a plan of subdivision, or a description under s. 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998 on the day before the day that an official plan policy authorizing inclusionary zoning was adopted by council.
  9. Community Planning Permit System - It is also proposed that O. Reg. 173/16, Community Planning Permits, would be amended to permit inclusionary zoning to be implemented within a community planning permit system on the basis described above.

Purpose of regulation

  1. To inform the public, stakeholders and municipalities of Ontario that the province is considering a regulation under the Planning Act;
  2. To provide the basic outline of the proposed new regulation; and
  3. To provide 45 days for the public, stakeholders and municipalities of Ontario to comment on the proposed regulation by directing their written concerns to the contact person noted below. (Note: personal information about the person providing comments, such as name, phone and address can be accessed by any individual under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and will be released, unless specifically requested not to do so.)

Other information

In addition to this EBR posting, comments can be submitted electronically to: inclusionaryzoning@ontario.ca

Comments can be provided electronically, by mail, or letter. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs can be reached during regular business hours from 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM, Monday to Friday, at 1-855-776-8011.

To submit written comments, please forward your response to the following Contact Person:

Laurie Miller, Director
Provincial Planning Policy Branch
777 Bay Street, 13th floor
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E5
Phone: 416-585-6014

Public consultation

This proposal was posted for a 45 day public review and comment period starting December 18, 2017. Comments were to be received by February 01, 2018.

All comments received during the comment period are being considered as part of the decision-making process by the Ministry.

Please Note: All comments and submissions received have become part of the public record.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Provincial Planning Policy Branch
Address

777 Bay Street
13th floor
Toronto, ON
M5G 2E5
Canada

Office phone number

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

This consultation was open from December 18, 2017
to February 1, 2018

Connect with us

Contact

Laurie Miller

Phone number
Office
Provincial Planning Policy Branch
Address

777 Bay Street
13th floor
Toronto, ON
M5G 2E5
Canada

Office phone number